In my column this week for the Globe’s Economy Lab (in the ROB) I talk about the political, economic and moral consequences of secession votes under poorly designed rules as was the case in the Scottish vote yesterday. There are many reasons why the status quo is entitled to a presumption in its favour, and that presumption requires a high voting threshold to overcome. Thus not only is a decision rule of 50% + 1 of voters actually undemocratic, it imposes many forms of cost on citizens through unnecessary uncertainty and encourages nationalist troublemakers to try repeatedly since the chances of success are relatively high under this ridiculously low threshold.
Absolutely right!!! Because emotion can play such a big part of the vote .. a higher threshold has to be maintained! Scotland has done extremely well under the Union – EU membership … Contribution to 300 years of English/Scottish/UK history Punching much higher than most 5 million strong countries (ie Ireland/Norway/Sweden/Finland…Belgium France …Spain or Portugal ….) can do …
Yet the Siren of independence – like on Odysseus ship – was so alluring that reason was abandoned! Scotland dodged the bullet … Slovakia didn’t and is still suffering from it …. 50% +1 is emotionally incorrect and dishonest politicians (Including Bouchard and Pariseau!!!) know it and continue to exploit it … maybe a 60% + 1 or even a 55% +1 would be more just….